Taormina v. Poline , 122 N.J. Eq. 221 ( 1937 )

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs, together with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause. We can only conclude that the decree appealed from was proper, and it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.