Camden Mortgage, C., Co. v. Haines , 110 N.J. Eq. 461 ( 1932 )

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Leaming, which rests upon the reasoning of the case of Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Co. v. Borton, above set out.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.