-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 169
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 138 A. 920, 104 N.J.L. 168, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 303
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 10/17/1927
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016