-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 245
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 21 A.2d 736, 127 N.J.L. 244, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 253
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 9/19/1941
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/8/2017