Stegman v. Civil Service Commission of the State , 117 N.J.L. 422 ( 1937 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 11.

For dismissal — Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.