-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Colie, Wells, JJ. 5.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 25 A.2d 879, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 246
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/23/1942
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024