Naidech v. U. C. C. of New Jersey , 134 N.J.L. 232 ( 1946 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.