-
*566 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -Case, Bobine, Peeskie, Heteield, Deas, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Hague, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Heheb, J. 1.
Document Info
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/25/1940
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024