-
*89 Pee Cueiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Paeker, Lloyd, Case, Hehee, Peeskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 169 A. 692, 112 N.J.L. 88, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 227
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/5/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024