Paretti v. Mitchell , 112 N.J.L. 384 ( 1934 )


Menu:
  • Pee Cubiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 170 A. 615, 112 N.J.L. 384, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 285

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 2/2/1934

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024