Boles v. Trenton Fire Clay and Porcelain Company , 103 N.J.L. 483 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach, in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, MinTURN, KaLISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LlOYD, VAN BuSKIRK, McGlennon, Kays, HetField, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.