-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 130 A. 921, 102 N.J.L. 229, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 329
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 10/19/1925
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024