Bencsko v. Cannara ( 1931 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trehchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodijste, Daly, Dohges, Yah Buskibk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.