Bartletta v. McFeeley , 113 N.J. Eq. 67 ( 1933 )


Menu:
  • *70 Per Curiam.

    The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

    For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 166 A. 144, 113 N.J. Eq. 67, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 982

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 4/27/1933

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024