-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chief Justice, Tbenohaed, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 160 A. 492, 109 N.J.L. 272, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 330
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/16/1932
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024