Labella v. Derr , 103 N.J.L. 493 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice G-ummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.