E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark , 103 N.J.L. 487 ( 1927 )


Menu:
  • The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 135 A. 917, 103 N.J.L. 487

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 1/31/1927

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/5/2016