Elizabeth v. Public Utility Com'rs , 99 N.J.L. 496 ( 1924 )

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.