-
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None. *Page 273
Document Info
Citation Numbers： 122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198
Judges： PER CURIAM.
Filed Date： 9/28/1923
Precedential Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 4/4/2017