Polizzano v. Mapes Holding Co. ( 1936 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — -None.