-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None. *Page 602
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 146 A. 917, 106 N.J.L. 601, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 201
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/20/1929
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/9/2017