State v. Kish , 103 N.J.L. 505 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should' be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.