McClellan v. General Casualty and Surety Company , 103 N.J.L. 702 ( 1927 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 137 A. 917, 103 N.J.L. 702, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 256

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 5/16/1927

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024