Eggert v. Binder ( 1924 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, fox the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.