Max v. Max ( 1940 )

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 7.

For reversal — CASE, HEHER, WELLS, HAGUE, JJ. 4.