Meader Atlas Co. v. Buhl , 103 N.J.L. 702 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam,' in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Kone.