Brooks-Wright, Inc. v. Nestico , 129 N.J.L. 95 ( 1942 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance —The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

    For reversal —None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 28 A.2d 126, 129 N.J.L. 95, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 285

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 9/18/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024