-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodinb, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, IIetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14. n
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 169 A. 692, 112 N.J.L. 97, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 235
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/5/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024