Isserman v. Isserman ( 1946 )

Per Curiam.

We have carefully considered the matters raised in the cross-appeal of the defendant, Abraham Isserman, from the allowance of counsel fee of $500 made to Michael G. Alenick in the court below and conclude that the appeal is without merit.

The portion of the order appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Come, Omphant, Wacheneeld, Raeeertt, Dill, Freund, MoGeehan, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.