-
*182 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Black, Katzehbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskirk, McGlennoh, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 138 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 181, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 320
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 10/17/1927
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024