Sullivan v. Stout , 120 N.J.L. 304 ( 1938 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Baeeerty, Walker, JJ. 16.

    For reversal — None.