-
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Hehee, Yan Buskirk, Heteield, Dear, Dill, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Parker, Lloyd, Perskie, Kays, Wells, JJ. 5.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 172 A. 566, 113 N.J.L. 33, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 330
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/4/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024