Symonsky v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J. , 103 N.J.L. 508 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for- ' the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. JusticeKalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.