-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for reasons expressed in the per cumam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 2/1/1932
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024