Ballentine v. Ballentine , 112 N.J. Eq. 222 ( 1933 )


Menu:
  • *227 Pee Curiam.

    The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Reed.

    For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 164 A. 5, 112 N.J. Eq. 222

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 1/5/1933

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024