-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None. *Page 181
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 139 A. 923, 104 N.J.L. 180, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 318
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 12/8/1927
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/15/2017