-
*33 Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Hehee, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 172 A. 566, 113 N.J.L. 32, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 329
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/4/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024