McLaughlin v. Hahne & Co. , 113 N.J.L. 32 ( 1934 )


Menu:
  • *33 Pee Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Hehee, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 172 A. 566, 113 N.J.L. 32, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 329

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 5/4/1934

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024