-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eatzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 6.
For reversal — Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, JJ. 4.
Document Info
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 3/26/1926
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024