McCrosson v. Civil Service Commission , 113 N.J.L. 406 ( 1934 )

This case presents much the same kind of a record as that disclosed in Naples v. Civil Service Commission of NewJersey, 113 N.J.L. 426, and for the reasons expressed in theper curiam opinion filed in that case the judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.