Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance ( 1948 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

    *601 For affirmance- — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14.

    For reversal — None.