Levins v. Fulton Specialty Co. ( 1923 )

Per Curiam.

■ The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief J ustice, Tkenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimer, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.