-
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 170 A. 56, 112 N.J.L. 87, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 225
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/5/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024