Femia v. City of Bayonne , 112 N.J.L. 89 ( 1934 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Hehee. Perskie, Yan Buskirk. Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.