-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ohiee Justice, Parker, Bodine, Peeskie, Portee, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 24 A.2d 849, 128 N.J.L. 321, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 251
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/23/1942
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024