Bloomer v. Bloomer , 100 N.J. Eq. 361 ( 1926 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be 'affirmed, for the -reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell,' Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennón, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.