Grant v. Steenland Construction Co. , 100 N.J. Eq. 566 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, KLalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11. .

For reversal — None.