Welsh v. Potts , 99 N.J.L. 528 ( 1924 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Minturn, Kaijsctt, Black, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 7.

    For reversal — Katzenbaci-i, Clark, JJ. 2.