-
Pee Clfriam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfied, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 136 A. 924, 103 N.J.L. 715, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 267
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/16/1927
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024