-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Uoyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Bodine, Daly, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 8.
For reversal — None.
For modification — Campbell, Donges, JJ. 2.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 156 A. 771, 108 N.J.L. 403, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 233
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 2/1/1932
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024