Jamieson v. Martin , 99 N.J.L. 508 ( 1924 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the réasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ohiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Mint-urn, Campbell, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Hone.